Govern AI systems before regulators, customers, or boards do.
Fines up to €35M. Applies to any organization whose AI affects EU individuals. EU AI Act consulting for US companies by Constantin Razvan Gospodin, European-barred attorney (ICATF nº 5961), advising from New York.
Our work has been featured in
Featured coverage on EU AI Act readiness, HR technology compliance, and the intersection of AI governance and employment law.
AI Governance first. EU AI Act second. Evidence throughout.
Regulatory readiness becomes more durable when it is built on a governance system, not a one-off legal checklist.
AI Governance
Roles, accountability, lifecycle controls, evidence ownership, escalation paths, and board-ready oversight.
NIST AI RMF
Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage as practical control language for AI risk decisions.
ISO/IEC 42001
A structured AI management-system lens for policies, objectives, controls, monitoring, and improvement.
EU AI Act
Scope, risk classification, technical documentation, conformity planning, and EU market access.
See the overlapping obligations before they fragment.
Lexara maps AI systems across governance frameworks, legal duties, and operating evidence so compliance does not become a patchwork.
NIST AI RMF + ISO/IEC 42001
Use risk management and AI management-system controls to create repeatable governance evidence.
EU AI Act + GDPR + AI
Connect high-risk AI obligations, automated decision-making, transparency, human oversight, and data protection.
EU Representative + Cross-Border AI
Coordinate non-EU provider exposure, Article 22 representation, documentation, and authority interface planning.
Advisory modules for regulated AI deployment
Each engagement starts with governance maturity and system exposure, then maps obligations to practical controls.
AI Governance Program Design
Build roles, policies, intake, risk review, monitoring, and board-ready evidence across AI use cases.
FrameworksNIST AI RMF + ISO 42001 Alignment
Translate risk and management-system principles into lightweight controls, records, and workflows.
EU AI ActEU AI Act Audit
Classify systems, identify Annex III exposure, map Article 2 scope, and prepare documentation roadmap.
GDPR + AIAutomated Decision Governance
Align AI governance with Article 22, DPIA/FRIA, transparency, human review, and rights handling.
AI LiteracyArticle 4 Literacy Program
Create role-based training, evidence records, and practical literacy expectations for providers and deployers.
EU Market AccessEU Representative Coordination
Article 22 mandate planning for non-EU high-risk AI providers, including documentation and authority interface.
Employment AINYC LL144 Bias Audit
Independent AEDT bias audit services for NYC employers, covering disparate impact analysis.
Independent AuditorNYC LL144 Independent Auditor
Qualified independent bias audits for Automated Employment Decision Tools under NYC Local Law 144.
Cross-BorderCross-Border Compliance
Map multi-jurisdiction AI obligations across EU, US federal, and state-level requirements.
ProcurementVendor AI Due Diligence
Evaluate AI vendor compliance posture, documentation quality, and contractual risk allocation.
Sector-specific AI governance for high-impact systems
Different AI use cases create different governance records, risk classifications, and buyer expectations.
Credit, underwriting, fraud, and customer risk models
Hiring, screening, promotion, and workforce AI tools
AI features embedded in platforms used across borders
Admissions, proctoring, adaptive learning, and EU partnerships
Clinical support, diagnostic tools, and regulated AI workflows
Internal copilots, decision support, procurement, and governance
Identify. Classify. Document. Govern. Monitor.
A practical command flow for moving from AI uncertainty to defensible governance evidence.
Identify
Inventory AI systems, vendors, users, decisions, data flows, and EU touchpoints.
Classify
Map risk under NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001 controls, EU AI Act, GDPR, and sector rules.
Document
Create technical, policy, literacy, DPIA/FRIA, and governance evidence records.
Govern
Assign accountability, approvals, escalation, oversight, and board reporting.
Monitor
Maintain post-deployment controls, model change review, incident signals, and updates.
European legal background, New York business context.
Lexara Advisory is led by Constantin Razvan Gospodin, a European-barred attorney and AI governance consultant focused on operational AI risk, EU AI Act readiness, GDPR + AI, and cross-border governance.
Read founder backgroundNew York fintech AI governance roadmap
A fintech using AI for credit and onboarding needs more than one regulation mapped. The governance path starts with system inventory and NIST/ISO-style controls, then classifies EU AI Act exposure, GDPR Article 22 implications, EU Representative needs, and ongoing monitoring evidence.
AI Governance intelligence, not a generic blog.
The existing Resource Center becomes a structured hub for articles, guides, checklists, templates, and regulatory intelligence.
NIST AI RMF vs EU AI Act
Use voluntary AI risk management to support mandatory legal and governance obligations.
Last Legally Reviewed: June 27, 2026 AI LiteracyArticle 4 AI Literacy
Role-based literacy and evidence records for providers and deployers.
Last Legally Reviewed: June 27, 2026 EU Market AccessEU Representative Coordination
Article 22 mandate planning for non-EU high-risk AI providers.
Last Legally Reviewed: June 27, 2026Build an AI governance roadmap before exposure compounds.
Start with the existing free assessment to triage governance maturity, EU AI Act scope, GDPR + AI overlap, AI literacy, EU Representative exposure, and legacy LL144 signals.
Last Legally Reviewed: June 27, 2026. Lexara Advisory LLC provides AI governance consulting and is not a law firm.